https://doi.org/10.4081/peasa.89

Projects for Europe: the projectification of society as a capacity for progress, renewal and engagement

Vol. 5 (2026)
Published: October 19, 2026
projectification, project society, Europe, institutional logics, project capability, public sector, civil society
Abstract Views: 39
PDF: 13
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Europe is confronted with technological, economic, environmental, geopolitical and societal challenges that demand more than policy intentions and established organisational routines. They demand the capacity to turn ideas into action and ambitions into tangible change. Projects have become one of the principal organisational forms through which such change is realised. This Academic Engagement/Perspective paper reflects on projectification from a European perspective and distinguishes three interrelated arenas: the private economy, where projects enable innovation, transformation and competitiveness; the public sector, where projects translate policies into infrastructure, reforms and public value; and society at large, where projects provide vehicles for civic engagement, arts, culture and collective action. Projectification is understood here as the increasing prevalence and societal embeddedness of projects and project practices. We distinguish it from project capability, meaning the ability to select, govern, resource, deliver and learn from projects. Evidence from Germany, Norway, Iceland, Croatia and Italy shows that projectification is substantial but not uniform. Our five-country research based on institutional logics further indicates markedly different trajectories even within Europe: Germany is characterised predominantly by a decentralised market- and profession-oriented logic, whereas Croatia displays a stronger supranational European Union governance logic. We therefore argue that projectification should be understood as a contextually embedded societal transformation rather than as a universal model. Europe does not simply need more projects; it needs project capabilities suited to different institutional settings and able to connect temporary initiatives with longer-term organisational and societal purposes.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Bayly S (2013). The end of the project: futurity in the culture of catastrophe. J Theor Humanit 18:161-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2013.804997
Boltanski L, Chiapello E (2018). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
European Commission (2025). A competitiveness compass for the EU. COM(2025) 30 final. Brussels: European Commission.
Fred M (2020). Local government projectification in practice: A multiple institutional logic perspective. Local Gov Stud 46:351-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1606799
Godenhjelm S, Lundin RA, Sjöblom S (2015). Projectification in the public sector: The case of the European Union. Int J Manag Proj Bus 8:324-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2014-0049
Henning CHCA, Wald A (2019). Toward a wiser projectification: Macroeconomic effects of firm-level project work. Int J Proj Manag 37:807-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.002
Hodgson D, Fred M, Bailey S, Hall P (eds) (2019). The projectification of the public sector. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315098586
Jacobsson M, Jałocha B (2021). Four images of projectification: An integrative review. Int J Manag Proj Bus 14:1583-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2020-0381
Jacobsson M, Jałocha B (2025). An essay on deprojectification: Drivers and consequences. Int J Proj Manag 43:102693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102693
Jacobsson M, Söderholm A (2022). An essay on 'Homo Projecticus': Ontological assumptions in the projectified society. Int J Proj Manag 40:315-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.11.004
Jensen AF, Thuesen C, Geraldi J (2016). The projectification of everything: Projects as a human condition. Proj Manag J 47:21-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700303
Kunst B (2012). The project horizon: On the temporality of making. Maska 27:64-71.
Lundin RA, Arvidsson N, Brady T, Ekstedt E, Midler C, Sydow J (2015). Managing and working in project society: Institutional challenges of temporary organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939454
Maier CS (2023). The project-state and its rivals: A new history of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674293175
Midler C (1995). 'Projectification' of the firm: The Renault case. Scand J Manag 11:363-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T
Müller R, Locatelli G, Holzmann V, Nilsson M, Sagay T (2024). Artificial intelligence and project management: Empirical overview, state of the art, and guidelines for future research. Proj Manag J 55:9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231225198
Munck af Rosenschöld J (2019). Inducing institutional change through projects? Three models of projectified governance. J Environ Policy Plan 21:333-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1606702
Nenni ME, De Felice F, De Luca C, Forcina A (2025). How artificial intelligence will transform project management in the age of digitization: A systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q 75:1669-1716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00418-z
Packendorff J, Lindgren M (2014). Projectification and its consequences: Narrow and broad conceptualisations. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci 17:7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807
Radujković M, Matuhina S, Novak I (2021). Phenomenon of projectification and the impact on the national economy: Case of Croatia. Poslovna Izvrsnost 15:9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22598/pi-be/2021.15.2.9
Sabini L, Paton S (2021). Professional regulatory entanglement: The curious case of project management in Italy. J Prof Organ 8:51-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joab001
Sansi R (2020). The artist and the stone: Project, process and value in contemporary art. J Cult Econ 13:709-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1604401
Schoper YG, Wald A, Ingason HT, Fridgeirsson TV (2018). Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. Int J Proj Manag 36:71-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008
Scott WR (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Söderlund J, Sydow J (2019). Projects and institutions: Towards understanding their mutual constitution and dynamics. Int J Proj Manag 37:259-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.001
Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008). Institutional logics. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications, pp 99-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4
Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2013). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Wagner R (2019). Projectification of society: The case of Italy. International Project Management Association. Available from: https://ipma.world/projectification-of-society-the-case-of-italy/.
Wagner R (2026). The divergent development of projectification in five countries from the perspective of institutional logics. In: Proceedings of the 14th IPMA Research Conference, Project Management Practice in a Disruptive Era: Integrating Technology, Innovation, and Sustainability. Bogotá: EAN University.
Wagner RF, Huemann M, Radujković M (2021). The influence of project management associations on projectification of society: An institutional perspective. Proj Leadersh Soc 2:100021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100021
Wagner R, Huemann M, Radujković M (2022). An institutional theory perspective on the role of project management associations for projectification of society: The case of Germany. Int J Manag Proj Bus 15:111-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2021-0259
Wagner RF, Radujković M (2022). Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects. Organ Technol Manag Constr 14:2559-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2022-0002
Wagner RF, Radujković M (2025). The 'invisible hand' of institutional logics on professionalizing project management amid increasing projectification. Int J Proj Manag 43:102726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102726
Wald A, Ingason HT, Fridgeirsson TV (2025). Ten years after: The evolution of projectification in Germany, Norway, and Iceland. Int J Proj Manag 43:102696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102696

How to Cite

1.
Wagner R, Radujković M. Projects for Europe: the projectification of society as a capacity for progress, renewal and engagement. Proceed Eur Acad Sci Arts [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 19 [cited 2026 Oct. 21];5. Available from: https://www.peasa.eu/site/article/view/89
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.